Posts mit dem Label Interaktion werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Interaktion werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

1.7.04

dump: Kriterien für die Bewertung der Interaktion

Kriterien für die Bewertung der Interaktion:

These are the standard ones, since not everyone has fancy eye tracking tools at their disposal:
  • Did they complete their tasks?
  • How long did it take?
  • How much mouse travel was involved between actions? How many distinct input actions (clicks, mouse movements, moving a hand from mouse to keyboard and back, etc.) did it take, in total?
  • How many errors did the user make? Did they have to fix something on a form or go back?

Then some of the more fuzzy ones, because humans aren't computers. Some are sort of quantifiable if you design the survey right.
  • How confident were they at each step that their input would do what they thought it would? How did they feel when it didn't?
  • Does the product *feel* solid, or like it's going to break?
  • Would you say the product is professional? Fun? What impression does it give you of the company/people who made it?
  • Is there another product that does the same job? Which would you rather use? Why?
Quelle @ 20040612-03.07: http://orkut.com/CommMsgs.aspx?cmm=1147&tid=4 : Nachricht von Matt McCarthy, 2/22/2004, 2:50 AM

8.6.04

Graph-Visualisierung: Munzner: Präsentationen

Präsentationen:

Außerdem:
  • Human Perception Tidbits / University of British Columbia / Departement of Computer Science (lokal von 20040416-06.50: MagicPoint_presentation_foils_5.htm)
  • Information Visualization with VRML: wenige Seiten – hat so gut wie nichts mit Thesaurus-Visualisierung zu tun – vermerkt, dass mit VRML keine hyperbolische Darstellung möglich ist (lokal von 20040416-08.51: World_Movers__The_VRML_2.0_Developers_Conference.htm)
  • Übersicht über die Präsentationen: Tamara Munzner: Talks (lokal von 20040416-06.36: talks.html)
  • Update @ 20040621: Tamara Munzner: Papers